1412 100423  [IM] [***(***@hotmail.com)]  foto :D http://maxfotos.ma.ohost.de/photo.php?=***@gmail.com

My god, when will people learn not to click those links :(

20:56 [melissa(**********@hotmail.com)] (L) http://youtube.glx.nl/watchv/=LJTwgF9BSYk-youtube.com 22:40 [martina(*****@hotmail.com)] (L) http://youtube.glx.nl/watchv/=LJTwgF9BSYk-youtube.com 23:11 [martina(*****@hotmail.com)] (L) http://youtube.glx.nl/watchv/=LJTwgF9BSYk-youtube.com 23:30 [martina(*****@hotmail.com)] (L) http://youtube.glx.nl/watchv/=LJTwgF9BSYk-youtube.com --- Day changed Tue Jun 03 2008 00:07 [martina(*****@hotmail.com)] (L) http://google.n10.nl/videoplay/docid=2882462888.com 00:49 [martina(*****@hotmail.com)] WOW (L) http://myspace.6te.net/britneyspears

...

I just couldn't resist.

Have a look at the following ZDNET post:

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Photos-iPhone-running-Windows-XP/0,130061733,339289801,00.htm?omnRef=1337

Ok, I must say, it is newsworthy. It's more or less a "breakthrough". I realise we have had mobile remote desktop solutions before (VNCsea for iPhone, and others). But this Citrix client is more then just a "remote desktop client". Because it doesn't just connect to a server running a certain OS. No, it connects to a server running more than 1 virtual instance of (perhaps multiple) operating system(s). So it is quite nice what Citrix achieved.

But, I must say: ZDNET: get your facts straight and do not try to deceive the reader in thinking that there was actually a windows XP running on the iPhone, because it was not! It was running as a virtual instance on a remote server. So at all time, to be able to use(not run) windows XP on your iPhone, you should have a wifi connection available. (I'm guessing that it would be just a bit to slow over a 3G connection...)

Or: Are them ZDNET editors just not capable of thinking straight?

Just my 2 cents ...

Well...

I got a message in my last.fm inbox, either it's spam, or it's a silly (breezer-like) girl/woman that's really really desperate. Well actually in both cases it's spam. Didn't expect to see this on last.fm though:

  From: G**
  Subject: hi.. what's up!
  Date: 14 Feb 2008, 03:18

  So, i guess it's time for me to start using this site. I can hold back no longer!
  I looked at your page and well,
  I liked   what I saw.. ;p

  So um, my name is K** P**. I think we should be friends, cause you seem pretty cool, and maybe even cute!
  (it's everso hard to tell in this digital world :)

  anyway, i'd go on all day, but I wanna get a response from you.. You should check out my other "space"
  on this other site, I'm always on over there: www.  date-centrale.  com/  ?id=2536&mypics (my
  username is petitebelle). Then maybe we could chat sometime! you know what they say..
  appearance wins over the eyes, but personality captures the heart.. haha..

  take care,

  K** P**

And I always thought I was safe from these kind of situations because I didn't participate in the netlog/looknmeet/... BS :( Thanks last.fm :(

Aaaah The Internets... Don't we just love it :-)

P.S. I censored her (nick)name and the url because I don't want any google hits on dating sites offcourse :-P